Archive for the 'General' Category

Nelson Was a Good Man

Nelson Doubleday, the second owner of the New York Mets, died earlier this week from pneumonia at the age of 81.

Nelson Doubleday was the reason the Mets won their last world series almost 30 years ago. That’s because he was the one who hired Frank Cashen and bankrolled the team. For all of you who think the Wilpons are the devil, then you are too young to remember M. Donald Grant and the way he drove the Mets into the ground during the mid to late 1970s.

Grant was the chairman and minority owner of the Mets after the first owner of the club, Joan Payson, passed away. He was the one responsible for getting rid of Tom Seaver and turning Shea Stadium into a ghost town in the late 70’s while the Yankees dominated the back pages. It’s the reason Shea was called Grant’s Tomb during those years. Again, if you thought the last few years were bad, then you simply did not experience the late 70s on the National League side of town when the Mets won no more than sixty-six games a year and with no hope in sight. Mets fans breathed a sigh of relief when it was learned that Lorrinda deRoulette, Payson’s daughter who inherited the team, would finally cry uncle and sell the team.

After the 1979 season, the team was sold to Nelson Doubleday Jr. Doubleday of the Doubleday Publishing empire came to the Mets with deep pockets and light was finally seen at the end of a long dark tunnel.

Many Mets fans were hoping for a George Steinbrenner type owner who would turn the Mets into a champion overnight. That didn’t happen. Instead, the quieter Doubleday hired Frank Cashen as general manager and instructed him to do what he needed to do to build the Mets into a winner, and a winner for a number of years. Doubleday would provide the necessary funds to support Cashen’s effort. But instead of signing free agents in an attempt to battle for the back pages with the Yankees, Cashen rebuilt the farm system, made keen trades, and used the free agent market to supplement what he was building. The result was a team that won 95 games on average per season from 1984 through 1990.

It was somewhat disappointing that the Mets only made the post season two of those seven years winning the World Series once in 1986 and a division title in ‘88. But the Mets were in contention every year and battled some very competitive division rivals at the time, most notably the Cubs, Cardinals, and Pirates. Plus had there been a wild card then, the Mets would have been in the post season from ’84 through ‘90. They finished in first or second place in the NL East for seven consecutive seasons.

Think about the players that came through the system, were traded for, or signed during that first decade of Doubleday ownership. Darryl Strawberry, Dwight Gooden, Keith Hernandez, Gary Carter, Mookie Wilson, Lenny Dykstra, Bobby Ojeada, George Foster, Ron Darling, Sid Fernandez, Kevin Mitchell, Kevin McReynolds, Howard Johnson, Ray Knight and many others all where there thanks to Cashen, thanks to Doubleday. Without a doubt, 1984 through 1990 were the greatest years the Mets franchise has ever had.

In 1986, a deal was struck where minority owner Fred Wilpon became equal partners with Doubleday. Whether it was a coincidence or not, things started to change for the franchise. I’m not saying that Wilpon was a villain and that’s why things went south but things did begin to sour regardless. Perhaps it was disappointment and frustration that the Mets did not achieve more with the talent they had. On paper, the Mets could have won the World Series three years in a row starting in ’86. However, in 1987 there was a host of injuries and of course, Doc’s drug problems that took him from the team while he attended rehab. The Mets rebounded in ’88 only to be shocked in the NLCS when everyone expected an A’s – Mets showdown. Ironically it was the A’s who started a consecutive three year run to the World Series led by GM—yep, Sandy Alderson.

Whatever magic worked under the Doubleday ownership didn’t work so well under the Doubleday-Wilpon ownership. There have been many stories over the years how the two owners despised one and other. Was it always that way?  Who knows but things simply did not go as smoothly as it had during those first several years of Doubleday’s ownership.

Again it was Doubleday who changed the Mets fortunes for the better in the late 1990s. Nelson was the reason the Mets traded for Mike Piazza in 1998. He instructed Steve Phillips, the GM at the time, to get Piazza at all cost while co-owner Fred Wilpon pledged allegiance to Todd Hundley.  And after the Mets traded with the Marlins for Pizza, Doubleday insisted that Phillips give Piazza whatever he wanted in a contract extension because the Mets needed him. Piazza agreed and became one of the greatest Mets of all time. Piazza lead the team to two consecutive post season appearances, the only time that has happened in Mets history.  He set the record for hitting the most homeruns as a catcher and eventually will go into the Baseball Hall of Fame wearing a Mets cap.  So it appears that the second period of success, the late ‘90s had more to do with Doubleday’s efforts than Wilpon’s.

In 2002, Wilpon bought out Doubleday and it’s the Wilpon family that has owned the team since. There were stories of court battles over the team’s worth but eventually Wilpon got the funds in place to take over the team for good. Most Mets fans do not have a positive feeling toward the Wilpons but the Mets last post season appearance, 2006, when they narrowly missed going to the World Series, happened entirely on Wilpon’s watch, both Fred and young Jeff who is really the acting owner these days. But the following season saw the worst collapse in Mets history followed by another season of falling short to make the playoffs.  Since the middle of last season, the team has been dreadful.

In fairness, the Wilpons are now presiding over the potential for some outstanding years ahead having let Sandy Alderson rebuild a mostly dysfunctional organization from the ground up much the way Cashen did thirty years ago. And it was Wilpon who wanted a new stadium as early as 1997 when rumors to move out of Shea Stadium first appeared in the New York Post. By contrast, Doubleday favored renovating Shea which really would have been putting lipstick on a pig. Now if anyone thinks Shea was better than Citi Field, then you a) have not been there yet or b) you are simply not going to give any credit to the Wilpons regardless of anything they do.

Regardless of which owner you favor, neither one will enter the Hall of Fame as a great baseball owner. I think it’s fair to say that neither man distinguished themselves as outstanding baseball owners. In a city where they lived and worked in the shadow of George Steinbrenner, how could they? For me as a fan, the one thing I find the most disturbing about the Doubleday/Wilpon ownership was that they built a juggernaut of a team in the 1980’s only to let it fall into decay in the 90’s that allowed an opening for the Yankees to take over. To this day, even with the promise of all these young kids the Mets have, the Amazin’s remain a second class citizen in New York. Still the Yankees outdraw the Mets even now while the Mets are in first place.

But regardless of all that, Doubleday was a decent guy, a regular guy who just happened to be worth millions. He treated his players like family according to Keith Hernandez and Ron Darling and was much beloved by his players. Doubleday will always remain an important cog in the history of the New York Mets and I think it’s fair to say he should be enshrined into the Mets Hall of Fame in the very near future.


A Night Out at the Game

May 19, 2015It was quite an interesting experience going to Citi Field Tuesday evening. Driving from Jersey is never a treat but we made it to the ballpark in about an hour and got home in less time. Guess I got lucky. One reason why we got there without too much stress is because we left early and got to the ballpark about 4:40PM. Low and behold, the gates had not yet open, and that brings me to my first nit-pick.

Look I know that these days security is important, that much is clear. We now can only enter the ballpark after being wanded and padded down by security for a safe night out at the ballgame, I get that. But why with Excelsior Club tickets that say go in through the Seaver entrance, do I have to wait until 5:40 when I can go in through the Jackie Robinson Rotunda at 5:10. Was that Tom’s idea? I know he breaks into tears a lot when interviewed lately but has he lost it all together? To me, this is just one of the many things that aid and abet websites like Why don’t the Wilpons just wear a sign that says “I’m with Stupid”? I know it’s not fair to the blame the owners but someone needs to explain this policy to me. Look, open all the gates at the same time or open the gates earlier for the customers that have paid more for their ticket. That would make more sense.

Obviously I went in through the Rotunda and to me it’s one of the classiest entrances of all of baseball. To you Mets fans that don’t get it, shame on you. It’s not about Jackie Robinson being a Dodger. It was about a black man breaking into all white baseball and his qualities of being such a great leader for minorities. By now you saw the movie. Read more about the man and tell me he does not deserve this memorial. What happened in 1947 when Jackie broke in with Brooklyn was one of the most significant  social events in American history. Baseball just happened to be the venue. Not to mention the guy could hit, run, and throw and eventually enter The Baseball Hall of Fame. Jackie deserves every testament that has been awarded him if not more. I applaud the Mets for creating the rotunda in his honor. It happened in New York and he was a player in the National League. It’s not his fault the Mets did not exist yet. Honestly if the Mets had not had such a miserable six year stretch since Citi Field opened, I don’t think the rotunda would ever have been much of an issue except for the most racist of fans that unfortunately are still out there.

Nit-pick number 2 – Sandwiches for 12 dollars. Really? I mean the food at Citi Field is really good but the prices are absolutely absurd. And a soda for six bucks, now there’s a bargain.

The new video board in centerfield looks fantastic. It’s clearer than any other board I have seen. I don’t think it’s quite as big as the one at Yankee Stadium but it is pretty close.  The new board is 5,760 square feet and is used to show replays and game related information including player stats and line scores. The alternate scoreboard in right field is also a video board but this season appears to be relegated to showing the lineups. One of the things I noticed and this will be nit-pick number 3 is when a team is batting, the right field board shows the lineup of the team in the field with a picture of the current pitcher. I was confused by this at first. However, the big board in center has the lineup of the hitting team with info on the current batter so I guess it made some sense after I got acclimated. There has also been another video ribbon board added just below the Excelsior level in left field as well as a shorter ribbon board below the Acela Club. That one is used to show strike outs (as well as ads) by the current Mets’ pitcher.

We sat right behind home plate in the Excelsior Level, really great seats. That’s the second main level. However, according to the elevator, there are six levels in Citi Field if you count the different suite levels.  Anyway, right behind us was the TV and Radio booths for both the Mets and Cardinals. It was great to see Tim McCarver doing the games for the Cards. I thought he had retired completely but I guess just from FOX. There were Gary, Keith, and Ron in the SNY booth and of course Howie and Josh on the radio side. They get this birds’ eye view every night.  Quite the dream job I would imagine. Well maybe not. Perhaps Gary Cohen complains to his wife every day that he can’t believe he has to go to the ballpark again. Maybe the grass isn’t always greener.

Besides the fact that the Mets got crushed (they did split the four game set with an outstanding Cardinals team, clearly the class of the National League), it really was an enjoyable night. For all the criticism the Wilpons take for everything Mets, they did a fantastic job with this new ballpark now in its seventh season already. And as the Mets continue to improve as I expect they will, this place will soon rock like Shea once did.



With the San Francisco Giant’s game seven win on Wednesday night, they capped their third world championship in five seasons. The Giants defeated the Texas Rangers in 2010 then the Detroit Tigers in 2012, and now the Kansas City Royals, all on the losing team’s home field. You have to consider the Giants of San Francisco to be a dynasty franchise. It is truly remarkable with the company they keep.

There are only a few teams that have accomplished what the Giants have done when you consider the clubs that have won three world championships within five seasons. Only eight other clubs (five franchises) have done the same or better in baseball history.

Two World Series victories within five years are outstanding. A number of teams have done that (The Mets are not one of them).  Baltimore, Cincinnati, the Dodgers, have all won two World Series within a five year stretch. And of course there are teams that have won more than one World Series within ten years. Are they chopped liver, of course not. But three World Series victories or more within a five year span is truly remarkable and as the statistics show, quite rare.

Prior to the Giants win this season, the last team to win three or more fall classics within five years was the Yankees. It should be no surprise to anyone that they have done it numerous times. In fact, the Yanks are the kings of post season baseball with twenty-seven world championships (40 appearances).

Between 1996 and 2000, the Yanks won four world championships, and likely the most impressive streak in franchise history when you take into account the modern playoff format compared to post season play prior to 1969. The Yankees won four consecutive series from 1936 through 1939 (then won the series again in 1941). The Bombers also won three World Series within the years 1958 to 1962. And perhaps something that will never be repeated is when the Yanks won five consecutive World Series from 1949 through 1953. Other teams that have won at least three World Series within five years include the Philadelphia Athletics of 1910, 1911, and 1913, the Boston Red Sox of 1912, 1915, 1916 (also won in ’18), the St. Louis Cardinals of 1942, 1944, 1946, and the Oakland Athletics of 1972, 1973, 1974, and the A’s of Oakland did so in three consecutive years after divisional play began.

Mentioning the San Francisco Giants with some of the legacy teams from the past may seem a bit overstated but perhaps it should be the other way around. Consider that prior to 1969 teams won their league pennant based on the regular season record of 154, then 162 games following the 1961-62 expansion. There were no divisional playoffs or wild cards. Therefore the only post season series was the World Series requiring just four wins to hoist the trophy. Today, a team must win a minimum of eleven games if they were division winners or twelve games if they entered the post season as one of the two wild cards (this season plus last). In other words, it is much more difficult to do what the Giants just accomplished (and the Yankees of the late 90’s) then it was for their predecessors. It took the ’49 through ’53 Yankees twenty wins to bring home five World Series trophies. It took the Giants of ’10, ’12, and ’14 34 wins to acquire three trophies. With all the waxing poetic in regards to the “great days of baseball past”, make no mistake that these are the great days of baseball.

It’s always difficult to compare eras in baseball. However, with today’s schedule and travel and the full month of playoffs following the regular season, plus 29 other teams to compete against, what the Giants have accomplished is truly incredible. They will be remembered as one of the great franchises of all time. The San Francisco/New York Giants move into second place on the all-time list of World Series appearances with 20, moving ahead of the Cardinals’ 19. They tie the Red Sox in fourth place with eight wins, three in San Francisco and the others in New York (1954, 1933, 1922, 1921, and 1905).

Here’s one more thing to consider adding to the argument of San Francisco being a truly elite team. It has become rare that a team wins three or more world championships within a five year period. As mentioned the last team to do so, the Yankees, did it almost twenty years ago. Outside of the Oakland Athletics of the mid-seventies, it only happened prior to the first wave of expansion in the 1960s and divisional play. From 1965 through 1972, only the Baltimore Orioles won more than one series, once in ’66 then again in ’70 but they did make four appearances.   After Oakland’s streak of three ended in ’74, only one team won three World Series spanning all of the years till the Yankees assault on the American League began in 1996. That was the Cincinnati Reds who won in ’75, ’76, and again in 1990. In fact from 1979 through 1990, there was a different World Champion each year. Again, that’s applied to teams winning more than once within a five year stretch. The Cardinals won two World Series during that time but six years apart. The point here is that it has become quite a phenomenon when a team wins three world championships in such a short amount of time.  The Boston Red Sox won three World Series since 2004. That’s outstanding but it’s not three wins within five seasons.

Of course when you think of baseball capitals in the US, you expect to hear New York, Boston, Atlanta, Los Angeles, St. Louis, and even Cincinnati for historical purposes. Now you have to throw San Francisco into the conversation. No two ways about it, the Giants are a dynasty.

For us Mets fans, the only thing we can hang our hat on is that the Mets made two World Series appearances in a five year stretch once. They won the Series in 1969. Four years later they came within one win of defeating the Oakland Athletics in 1973, during the A’s three in a row streak. The dominant Mets teams of the late 1980s were not dominant enough, making the playoffs just twice in ’86 and ’88 but only winning the Series once against Boston in ’86. The last time the Mets were in the World Series was in 2000, the last of four wins for the Yankees in a five year stretch.

First Time Match Up

At the conclusion of the regular season, ten teams made the post season. Of the ten teams making the playoffs, five in each league, there were twenty-five possible combinations of teams that could make the World Series.  Nine of the ten teams have made at least one appearance in the World Series. Washington (previously Montreal) never made the fall classic. Kansas City and the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim (called that at the time) were in the series just once with the remaining seven making the World Series multiple times, St. Louis the most. Of the teams having made the World Series before, here is a list of the teams that have played each other in the past.

Detroit vs. San Francisco – 2012: Giants 4-0
Detroit vs. St. Louis – 2006: Cardinals 4-1, 1968: Cardinals 4-3, 1934 Cardinals 4-3
Anaheim vs. San Francisco – 2002: Angels 4-3
Oakland vs. San Francisco – 1989: A’s 4-0, 1913: Philadelphia A’s 4-1 (over NY Giants), 1911: Phila. 4-2 (over NY)
LA Dodgers vs. Oakland – 1988: Dodges 4-2, 1974: A’s 4-1
Kansas City vs. St. Louis – 1985: Royals 4-3
Baltimore vs. Pittsburgh – 1979: Pirates 4-3, 1971: Pirates 4-3
LA Dodgers vs. Baltimore – 1966: Orioles 4-0
Baltimore (St. Louis Browns) vs St. Louis 1944: Cardinals 4-2
St. Louis vs Oakland (Philadelphia A’s) – 1931: Cardinals 4-3, 1930: A’s 4-2
Pittsburgh vs. Detroit – 1909: Pirates 4-3

As mentioned, the Nats never played in a World Series, therefore if they had made it to the Series, it would have been a first time matchup regardless of whom they played, obviously. Other first time matchups included -

Detroit vs. LA Dodgers
LA Angels vs. LA Dodgers (that would have been fun)
LA Angels vs. Pittsburgh
LA Angles vs. St. Louis
Oakland vs. Pittsburgh
Baltimore vs. San Francisco
Kansas City vs. Pittsburgh
Kansas City vs. Los Angeles
Kansas City vs. San Francisco (Bingo)

So with all these teams having played each other more often than not, we get a first time matchup that should be very interesting. It’s not a ratings grabber by any stretch of the imagination but witnessing the pitching that both of these clubs demonstrated in the post season so far, it should be a closely matched, well played series.

Realize between both of these teams there have only been two losses so far, both by the Giants. The Royals have won eight in a row starting with their wild card win over Oakland. The Giants were also a wild card, the number 2 wild card for that matter. It’s the first time a number 2 card has made the Series. San Francisco lost one in the division series against Washington and one against the Cardinals in the NLCS.

Because of the ridiculous All Star rule that determines home field advantage (even a coin toss would be better), the series starts Tuesday night in Kansas City’s Kaufman Stadium. If the series runs seven games and barring any rainouts it will end on Wednesday, October 29th.


The Mets went 2-4-2 on the just completed road trip. Two wins, four losses, and two games they should have won had Terry Collins and Dan Warthen had enough sense to remove Jenrry Mejia with a six run lead on Saturday night in Colorado and obviously fooling no one. Then on Monday night in Miami when Dice-K was walking the ballpark. he should have got the hook after the first two batters reached on walks. Sorry, but I think those two are on Terry.

Anyway, just when you thought the Mets were turning the corner, they take a step backwards. Personally I would like to see the Mets start promoting some of those young arms for the bullpen. Put Mejia in the pen and let Dice-K start. Looks like Flores is coming up to be the work-in-progress shortstop. The Mets have to do something to wake up this anemic offense.

Oh, Ike Davis went 3 for 4 this evening in Pittsburgh. I know, he has not really been doing well but what Met has gone 3 for 4 lately?

Rubber and Hope

Tonight’s game is the first rubber game of the season. What’s a rubber game you ask?

It’s the game that decides who wins the series when there are an odd number of games in the series and both teams have won an equal amount of games. Most rubber games in baseball occur in a three game series after the teams split the first two games. But it is possible for there to be a rubber game in a rare five game set that may have to be scheduled because of previous postponements.  The seventh game of the World Series could be considered a rubber game but generally it isn’t because of its extreme importance. But what is the origin of the term, rubber game?

It’s difficult to say with certainty but apparently it is a very old term that has been used for other types of competitive matches where a deciding game was played. It likely is from England and the term pre dates the substance we think of when we hear the word “rubber”. Rubber is a synonym of eraser, to rub out. It likely meant that after the deciding game or the “rubber” game, the scoreboard (perhaps chalk on slate) would have been erased or rubbed out so a new match could begin.

So anyway, tonight’s “match” against the Braves will be the Mets first rubber game of the season. Trailing 0-2 in games to Washington in the opening series then leading Cincinnati 2-0 in the weekend series meant the final game in each of the first two series was not a deciding game.

Beyond this fascinating exploration of term origins, I am seeing some positive signs from the Mets. Even in last night’s loss, there were good things that happened.

First was Zach Wheeler. His stuff is electric and he had Jason Heyward struck out in the top of the first. Unfortunately, the home plate umpire called a fastball over the outside corner of the plate a ball when it should have been strike three. That caused Wheeler to throw more pitches that Heyward kept fouling off before he parked one in the right field stands. Wheeler was pretty solid after that until things unraveled in the fifth.  Once Zach figures out his secondary and tertiary pitches, he is going to become one awesome pitcher. In fact, I predict in a couple of years, he will be the ace of the staff. Perhaps down the road when you think of the Mets top three it will be Wheeler, Syndergaard, and then Harvey but time will tell.

The other positive was the Mets coming back in the top of the ninth. True they fell a run short but they didn’t give up and got a key hit from Travis d’Arnaud. If this kid starts to hit the way he has in the minors then maybe the Mets truly have a budding star in their stable. It’s all wait and see at this point but even at 3-5, clearly there is some hope here.


So Boomer and Mike, Daniel Murphy should have made his wife schedule a C-Section before the start of the baseball season so he would not have to miss any games? That’s your take?

This is why I do not listen to sports talk radio. Look, I love baseball, it has been (for good or worse) one of the great distractions in my life. But I am sorry, for the most part, jocks are morons and so are sports talk show hosts who were not good enough to be on the field.  Here is the quote from Boomer Esiason, co host of WFAN’s Boomer and Carton radio program.  “Quite frankly, I would have said C-section before the season starts.  I need to be at Opening Day. I’m sorry. This is what makes our money. This is how we’re going to live our life. This is going to give my child every opportunity to be a success in life. I’ll be able to afford any college I want to send my kid to because I’m a baseball player.”

Let’s take the points Boomer made. He says “this is what makes our money”.  Yes true, as a baseball player, Daniel Murphy will make his money playing baseball. But as a baseball player, Murphy is also entitled to take three games off for paternity leave. That was collectively bargained by the players union and the baseball owners. Please explain to me how Murphy is putting his baseball income in jeopardy by being with his wife while she gave birth to their first child. I think he would be more appropriately concerned in that regard if he batted .215 for the season.

Giving that child every opportunity to be a success in life has not been threatened by Murphy doing what every father in this country is entitled to do. Murphy will continue to make his income and provided he and his wife are smart investors, that child of theirs should do just fine. Murphy will make almost three million dollars this season and of course that does not count what he has saved prior to this season and any endorsements he may have.

What I really find offensive is how Esiason is so cavalier in stating Murphy’s wife simply should have scheduled a C-Section prior to the season, as if she were having her teeth cleaned. A C-Section is major surgery requiring up to six weeks recovery time. The procedure was not nature’s intent but a modern solution to a problem that in the past threatened the life of the unborn child, the mother, or to both. His remark is completely insensitive to the scale of the seriousness of the situation. We are talking about her health as well as the child’s.

Of course the real issue for these clowns with microphones is not about Murphy’s wife and the couples’ new born. It centers on the fact that both Esiason and Craig Carton, his loud mouthed co-host, are pissed off that the Mets have started the season at 0-3. As if Murphy’s appearance in the lineup on Monday afternoon and Wednesday evening would have made a difference in this train wreck of a franchise. Murphy was in the lineup yesterday afternoon and had a hit and a walk in three at bats. See the difference? Look how it changed the outcome of the game? What….? Oh, right. They lost.

Baseball is a game folks, it’s not life or death. As much as C-Sections are routine, they still are considered major surgery and with that comes the potential of something going wrong. Murphy did the right thing. His place was by his wife’s side, being there through a major event in their lives.

If this Mets season, that has started out so badly, continues in this trend, it will be defined by a bullpen that can’t get anyone out and an offense that chronically cannot score runs. Murphy’s absence during the first two games will have nothing to do with it. And really, picking on Daniel Murphy? What Mets players is more of a gamer than Murph? Love him or hate him, he busts his butt every day on the field. He played in 160 games last year.

Mike Francesa backed off somewhat, as the coward often does, because of all the flak he received for making similar comments. He claims that what he meant was a guy like Murphy, who has a unique position, should not be allowed to take the time off.  That’s a slippery slope. So I guess if you are fortunate enough to make lots of money and be in the public eye, you are no longer entitled to the same rights everyone else has. Francesa’s true colors always seem to come out. He had previously stated that no man should be able to take time off for something like this (maternity), that it was a scam to do so. Yeah, Mike, I guess they’re just takers just like the unemployed, impoverished, and mentally ill in this country. Gee, I wonder who you voted for in the last election.

But really why are we so upset? Does anyone really take seriously what these knuckleheads say day in and day out? The reality is they really don’t know too much about anything, including sports in many cases I might add. But who really should be concerned about these remarks, even more so than most of us, is the wives of Esiason and Francesa. Hopefully they are now aware not to plan any major surgeries on days these two bozos are on the air.