Good Read…

Check this article out from MLB.com in regards to the Mets hunt for a shortstop. Kind of falls in line with my thinking this winter.

Tul-no

Many Mets fans are burning up the Internet wanting the Mets to trade for Troy Tulowitzki at all costs.  Okay faction, then if that happens and if Noah Syndergaard or Travis d’Arnaud or Zach Wheeler or whatever current Mets players or prospects are excelling elsewhere and Tulo is battling hip issues and out of the lineup more than in with the Mets, you will need to shut up. You will have to refrain from bashing the front office for not having the foresight to not have seen this coming. You will need to not comment on how the Mets caved to fan pressure and make a deal just to steal the back pages. You must defend your argument when others were saying this is not a good long term deal for the Mets, at least at the current price Colorado is asking.

If you haven’t figured it out by my first paragraph then let me be clear. The Mets would be insane to make this deal for what the Rockies are asking. Now, am I saying the Mets should not get Tulowitzki? No, I am simply saying that today, the cost is way too high.

A popular opinion is the trade would put the Mets over the top and make them a clear favorite to win the NL East. Not if they remove some of the outstanding pitching they have compiled. Not if they lose that pitching (and others) and Tulo spends half the season, as he has done the last two of three seasons, on the disabled list. I think Mets GM Sandy Alderson is doing the right thing by waiting this out, waiting for the price to become more reasonable.   With 116 million dollars due on his contract, Tulo is Colorado’s problem, not ours. The Rockies want to move him. All buyers need to be ware.

Another fear Mets fans have is that Tulowitzki will end up in the Bronx. Really? If the Rockies are asking the Mets for a combination of Wheeler, Jacob deGrom, Syndergaard, d’Arnaud or Kevin Plawecki, Steven Matz and others, how do the Yankees match that?  The Rockies want young major league ready players to control for several years. The Yanks do not have that to offer. And if a deal is struck with the Yankees, the league should investigate because clearly, they are asking the Mets for a hell of a lot more. Now the one thing the Yanks could do that the Mets can’t is to take on Tulowitzki’s entire salary. However, if they could do that, then why isn’t Brian Cashman signing Matt Scherzer?

I understand the fans’ frustration. The Mets payroll is not as high as it should be. They never make a splash anymore. Other teams make deals why can’t the Mets? I get it. But care needs be taken. Every scout agrees the Mets now have one of the top farm systems in baseball. Last season we began to see the fruit ripen at the major league level. More are coming and this team could be loaded from within very soon.  This is how teams like the Giants (3 world championships in five years), the Cardinals (3 pennants and two World Series victories since 2006), and Red Sox (3 world championships in 10 years) have done it. And the Yankees of the late 90s and into the new century did it too. They built a great core from within then supplemented the team with key free agent signings and trades. Do you really want the Rockies to benefit from the patience you and the Mets organization has endured to develop these players. Look, if Tulo was healthy and was the type of player that started 150 games or more each season, then it’s a different story. Then I’m all in. But there is huge risk with a player who is now on the dark side of 30, has had a history of not being able to stay in the lineup, now has hip problems at the age of 30 (bad sign folks –think A-Rod) and is owed 116 million that Colorado does not want to pay any of.

I read one comment where someone tried to compare Gary Carter to Tulowitzki in that he had injury concerns too. The difference was Carter played through his knee problems. He was out of the lineup seldom in comparison to Tulo and the Mets did not have to give up the amount of pitching to get him from Montreal at the time that the Rockies are asking for today. Don’t stop to think for one minute that other GM’s do not know the pressure the Mets are under from their fans. They are not interested in helping the Mets, they want to help their own teams and if GMs sense the Mets are caving to pressure from an angry fan base, they will hope the Mets blink first and take home a huge haul.

I for one am tired of the paradigm where the Mets seem to make the playoffs once a decade or so surrounded by mediocre to downright lousy seasons. Would you have the Mets trade away the farm for Tulo and hope they win it all in 2015, sacrificing a future where the Mets could contend every season?  The sexy move you clamor for could very well be short lived. Major League baseball is not played in the winter. Getting Tulo at the current asking price puts no wins on the board in December or January. And there is a huge potential that it doesn’t put up too many more wins from April to October. Imagine Tulo on the disabled list in August with one of Wheeler or deGrom chucking to d’Arnaud in Colorado with Brandon Nimmo ready to be called up soon.

Alderson is playing this right. He knows the asking price is too high but he could make a move if the Rockies blink and lower their demands. Stay the course Mets. Things are going to get much better soon. Don’t screw this up.

Dynasty

With the San Francisco Giant’s game seven win on Wednesday night, they capped their third world championship in five seasons. The Giants defeated the Texas Rangers in 2010 then the Detroit Tigers in 2012, and now the Kansas City Royals, all on the losing team’s home field. You have to consider the Giants of San Francisco to be a dynasty franchise. It is truly remarkable with the company they keep.

There are only a few teams that have accomplished what the Giants have done when you consider the clubs that have won three world championships within five seasons. Only eight other clubs (five franchises) have done the same or better in baseball history.

Two World Series victories within five years are outstanding. A number of teams have done that (The Mets are not one of them).  Baltimore, Cincinnati, the Dodgers, have all won two World Series within a five year stretch. And of course there are teams that have won more than one World Series within ten years. Are they chopped liver, of course not. But three World Series victories or more within a five year span is truly remarkable and as the statistics show, quite rare.

Prior to the Giants win this season, the last team to win three or more fall classics within five years was the Yankees. It should be no surprise to anyone that they have done it numerous times. In fact, the Yanks are the kings of post season baseball with twenty-seven world championships (40 appearances).

Between 1996 and 2000, the Yanks won four world championships, and likely the most impressive streak in franchise history when you take into account the modern playoff format compared to post season play prior to 1969. The Yankees won four consecutive series from 1936 through 1939 (then won the series again in 1941). The Bombers also won three World Series within the years 1958 to 1962. And perhaps something that will never be repeated is when the Yanks won five consecutive World Series from 1949 through 1953. Other teams that have won at least three World Series within five years include the Philadelphia Athletics of 1910, 1911, and 1913, the Boston Red Sox of 1912, 1915, 1916 (also won in ’18), the St. Louis Cardinals of 1942, 1944, 1946, and the Oakland Athletics of 1972, 1973, 1974, and the A’s of Oakland did so in three consecutive years after divisional play began.

Mentioning the San Francisco Giants with some of the legacy teams from the past may seem a bit overstated but perhaps it should be the other way around. Consider that prior to 1969 teams won their league pennant based on the regular season record of 154, then 162 games following the 1961-62 expansion. There were no divisional playoffs or wild cards. Therefore the only post season series was the World Series requiring just four wins to hoist the trophy. Today, a team must win a minimum of eleven games if they were division winners or twelve games if they entered the post season as one of the two wild cards (this season plus last). In other words, it is much more difficult to do what the Giants just accomplished (and the Yankees of the late 90’s) then it was for their predecessors. It took the ’49 through ’53 Yankees twenty wins to bring home five World Series trophies. It took the Giants of ’10, ’12, and ’14 34 wins to acquire three trophies. With all the waxing poetic in regards to the “great days of baseball past”, make no mistake that these are the great days of baseball.

It’s always difficult to compare eras in baseball. However, with today’s schedule and travel and the full month of playoffs following the regular season, plus 29 other teams to compete against, what the Giants have accomplished is truly incredible. They will be remembered as one of the great franchises of all time. The San Francisco/New York Giants move into second place on the all-time list of World Series appearances with 20, moving ahead of the Cardinals’ 19. They tie the Red Sox in fourth place with eight wins, three in San Francisco and the others in New York (1954, 1933, 1922, 1921, and 1905).

Here’s one more thing to consider adding to the argument of San Francisco being a truly elite team. It has become rare that a team wins three or more world championships within a five year period. As mentioned the last team to do so, the Yankees, did it almost twenty years ago. Outside of the Oakland Athletics of the mid-seventies, it only happened prior to the first wave of expansion in the 1960s and divisional play. From 1965 through 1972, only the Baltimore Orioles won more than one series, once in ’66 then again in ’70 but they did make four appearances.   After Oakland’s streak of three ended in ’74, only one team won three World Series spanning all of the years till the Yankees assault on the American League began in 1996. That was the Cincinnati Reds who won in ’75, ’76, and again in 1990. In fact from 1979 through 1990, there was a different World Champion each year. Again, that’s applied to teams winning more than once within a five year stretch. The Cardinals won two World Series during that time but six years apart. The point here is that it has become quite a phenomenon when a team wins three world championships in such a short amount of time.  The Boston Red Sox won three World Series since 2004. That’s outstanding but it’s not three wins within five seasons.

Of course when you think of baseball capitals in the US, you expect to hear New York, Boston, Atlanta, Los Angeles, St. Louis, and even Cincinnati for historical purposes. Now you have to throw San Francisco into the conversation. No two ways about it, the Giants are a dynasty.

For us Mets fans, the only thing we can hang our hat on is that the Mets made two World Series appearances in a five year stretch once. They won the Series in 1969. Four years later they came within one win of defeating the Oakland Athletics in 1973, during the A’s three in a row streak. The dominant Mets teams of the late 1980s were not dominant enough, making the playoffs just twice in ’86 and ’88 but only winning the Series once against Boston in ’86. The last time the Mets were in the World Series was in 2000, the last of four wins for the Yankees in a five year stretch.

First Time Match Up

At the conclusion of the regular season, ten teams made the post season. Of the ten teams making the playoffs, five in each league, there were twenty-five possible combinations of teams that could make the World Series.  Nine of the ten teams have made at least one appearance in the World Series. Washington (previously Montreal) never made the fall classic. Kansas City and the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim (called that at the time) were in the series just once with the remaining seven making the World Series multiple times, St. Louis the most. Of the teams having made the World Series before, here is a list of the teams that have played each other in the past.

Detroit vs. San Francisco – 2012: Giants 4-0
Detroit vs. St. Louis – 2006: Cardinals 4-1, 1968: Cardinals 4-3, 1934 Cardinals 4-3
Anaheim vs. San Francisco – 2002: Angels 4-3
Oakland vs. San Francisco – 1989: A’s 4-0, 1913: Philadelphia A’s 4-1 (over NY Giants), 1911: Phila. 4-2 (over NY)
LA Dodgers vs. Oakland – 1988: Dodges 4-2, 1974: A’s 4-1
Kansas City vs. St. Louis – 1985: Royals 4-3
Baltimore vs. Pittsburgh – 1979: Pirates 4-3, 1971: Pirates 4-3
LA Dodgers vs. Baltimore – 1966: Orioles 4-0
Baltimore (St. Louis Browns) vs St. Louis 1944: Cardinals 4-2
St. Louis vs Oakland (Philadelphia A’s) – 1931: Cardinals 4-3, 1930: A’s 4-2
Pittsburgh vs. Detroit – 1909: Pirates 4-3

As mentioned, the Nats never played in a World Series, therefore if they had made it to the Series, it would have been a first time matchup regardless of whom they played, obviously. Other first time matchups included -

Detroit vs. LA Dodgers
LA Angels vs. LA Dodgers (that would have been fun)
LA Angels vs. Pittsburgh
LA Angles vs. St. Louis
Oakland vs. Pittsburgh
Baltimore vs. San Francisco
Kansas City vs. Pittsburgh
Kansas City vs. Los Angeles
Kansas City vs. San Francisco (Bingo)

So with all these teams having played each other more often than not, we get a first time matchup that should be very interesting. It’s not a ratings grabber by any stretch of the imagination but witnessing the pitching that both of these clubs demonstrated in the post season so far, it should be a closely matched, well played series.

Realize between both of these teams there have only been two losses so far, both by the Giants. The Royals have won eight in a row starting with their wild card win over Oakland. The Giants were also a wild card, the number 2 wild card for that matter. It’s the first time a number 2 card has made the Series. San Francisco lost one in the division series against Washington and one against the Cardinals in the NLCS.

Because of the ridiculous All Star rule that determines home field advantage (even a coin toss would be better), the series starts Tuesday night in Kansas City’s Kaufman Stadium. If the series runs seven games and barring any rainouts it will end on Wednesday, October 29th.

Mets Splits

Another disappointing Mets season but things are looking brighter for the future. Here are the 2014 splits for anyone who is interested. The total record for the season was 79-83. It’s the second time in franchise history to end with the same record (2010).

The Mets vs. the NL East – 38-38
Vs. Atlanta – 10-9
Vs. Miami – 11-8
Vs. Philadelphia – 13-6
Vs. Washington – 4-15

The Mets vs. the NL Central – 16-18
Vs. Chicago – 2-5
Vs. Cincinnati – 4-2
Vs. Milwaukee – 3-4
Vs. Pittsburgh – 3-4
Vs. St. Louis – 4-3

The Mets vs. the NL West – 14-18
Vs. Arizona – 4-2
Vs. Colorado – 4-3
Vs. Los Angeles Dodgers – 2-4
Vs. San Diego – 3-3
Vs. San Francisco – 1-6

The Mets vs. the American League – 11-9
Vs. Houston – 2-1
Vs. Los Angeles Angels – 1-2
Vs. New York Yankees – 2-2
Vs. Oakland – 2-2
Vs. Seattle -2-1
Vs. Texas – 2-1

The Mets by month –
March – 0-1
April – 15-10
May – 11-18
June – 11-17
July – 15-10
August – 12-17
September – 15-10

The Mets by Days of the Week -
Sunday – 16-11
Monday – 8-10
Tuesday – 14-10
Wednesday – 10-13
Thursday – 6-13
Friday – 13-12
Saturday – 12 -14

The Mets in…
Extra innings – 7-8
Scoring first – 56-30
Scoring second – 23-41 (does not include being shut out)
Shutouts – 11-12
Rubber games – 11-7
Walk Offs – 6-9
By one run – 26-29
By two runs – 16-13
By three runs – 9-18
By four runs – 9-8
By five runs – 7-4
By six or more runs – 12-11
Vs. Right handed pitching – 62-67
Vs. left handed pitching – 17-16
At home – 40-41
Away – 39-42
Night – 48-64
Day – 31-19
Doubleheaders – split 2
Longest winning streak – 4 (twice)
Longest losing streak 6

Something Positive Moving Ahead

On the day the Derek Jeter film concluded production in the Bronx with an outlandish ending where the hero saves the day by driving in the winning run after the Orioles’ closer blew it, the Mets lost in Washington to guarantee another losing season.

But why are we so dismayed. This is a franchise (the Mets that is) that has losing at its core. It is the sixth consecutive season the Mets have played to a losing record. In fact, Citi Field has never seen the home team win more games than they have lost. But it’s not the first time we have endured such a streak. And if you are as old as I am then you know what I am talking about.

From 1962 through 1968: losers. From 1977 through 1983: losers yet again. From 1991 to 1996: yep, losers. Then again in 2002 through 2004 and now since 2009. A National League franchise in the greatest baseball city, historically speaking, in the world and they can’t break the mold of losing more often than winning.

Why, what is stopping this team from taking the next step? Where do we begin? At the top I guess.

It has to start with the Wilpons. I’m not saying its money. That’s not the only way to build a team. There are many clubs who spend more than the Mets and lose. However, a team needs to have the financial flexibility to get that key player when opportunity knocks.  There was a time when that was true. It was true when part owner Nelson Doubleday put his two cents in and demanded that GM Steve Philips trade for Mike Piazza. Sorry Fred and Jeff, Nelson may have been your nemesis but without him, Todd Hundley would have continued to be the catcher. And if that happened, do 1999 and 2000 ever happen?

In fairness, the Wilpons wrote out many checks in care of Omar Minaya for Pedro Martinez, Carlos Beltran, Billy Wagner, Carlos Delgado, and Paul Lo Duca. Those moves got the Mets back to the playoffs. So how do you say the Wilpons don’t spend? The evidence suggests otherwise. The problems of post 2006 stem from the Wilpons not knowing how to plan for a rainy day. Under Minaya, the Mets did nothing for a deteriorating farm system. They spent way too little on player development and way too much on older players as if they were attempting to fix a severed leg with a band aid. There was never a singular mission statement for the organization. Players at different levels of the Mets system received contradictory messages, and mostly from a tyrannical head of player development more interested in challenging minor league players to a fist fight. There was confusion and no clear vision. But that all changed when the Mets were almost forced to bring in Sandy Alderson by a commissioner doing his best to help his friend Fred hold on to his team. But no sooner was Alderson hired when another ugly truth became known.

Bernie Madoff certainly had an influence on the Mets fortunes. It really wasn’t clear what the Mets finances would be once the smoke cleared after the Ponzi scheme was exposed. And regardless of the spin at the top levels of the organization, the money did not appear to be as liquid as it once was. As the Mets continued to flounder, SNY’s ratings began to dwindle and the turnstiles stopped turning. The Mets no longer had the deep pockets to simply rob Peter to pay Paul the way the Yankees did when George Steinbrenner took over the Yankees in 1973.

Now back to Alderson. He really is the right person to turn around this franchise. And by that I mean turn it around in a way we have not seen before, or at least in a very long time. A complete reboot, not a quick fix to satisfy a disgruntled fan base starving to win, a fan base that has had to endure Yankee rule for two decades.

When Alderson looked closely at the organization known by many as the New York Mess, he realized this was not going to be an overnight repair. It would start at the bottom and work its way up. The key word is infrastructure. Any successful endeavor must have a solid infrastructure, a singular mission statement that all within the organization can follow.  In the case of a successful baseball team, the infrastructure must include the ability to draft, teach, and develop their young players through a top notch farm system. There must be continuity. The right players must be drafted then signed (that costs money and its money well spent). They then must be taught an organizational philosophy, one that is carried through each level of the system. It must be a methodology that prepares the young players for the major league level.

One of the positives we can take from this sixth losing season in a row is that this year, we began to see the fruits of the toil. We began to see Mets players coming up from the system and contributing in a positive way. Obviously there is a way to go but this can only continue to get better as players from all levels gain experience.

Twice before we have seen these organizational philosophies lead to championships. The first was during the early to mid-sixties when the brand new franchise focused on young players. It happened again when the team was sold in 1979. And now it is happening again. The key this time is to sustain the process. After the 1969 World Series, the Mets sat on their laurels and did little to continue the process that brought them their first championship in ’69 and a pennant in ’73. Again in the late 80’s after their second world championship and another post season appearance two years later, the Mets became complacent and failed to continue the process of supplementing the talent from within.

The St. Louis Cardinals are the ultimate in demonstrating how to perpetuate a winner. They are the model franchise of baseball and of course they are not alone. Other clubs have followed that model successfully. Now the Mets are hoping they are not too far away from doing the same. There certainly is a lot of room for optimism when you look at how the Mets farm system has progressed the last four seasons. There are lots of very good prospects in the organization, especially pitching. But it’s not going to be easy. Many organizations, including most in the Mets division have good young pitching. It’s not like the Mets have figured something out no one else has. For the Mets to improve next season, they are going to have to supplement the offence with more guys who put the ball in play.

When the Mets scored first this season, their record was 56-30 (.651). This speaks volumes about how far the pitching has come. It suggests that Met pitchers were able to hold leads (and in many cases, those leads were slim). However in games where the opposition scored first, the Mets record was a paltry 23-53 (.302) including being shut out 12 times. Obviously this indicates a lack of ability to score late and often.

So the positive for next year and hopefully years to come is the Mets have a very talented stable of pitchers to round out the rotation and bullpen. A rotation of Wheeler, DeGrom, Harvey, Gee, Colon, and Niese could be very daunting. Then there is Syndergaard,  Montero,and  Matz in the wings. You can never have enough pitching.

But a couple of these pitchers may have to go in a trade. If David Wright and Curtis Granderson had close to their career years this past season, maybe we would be singing a different song today. Maybe one of those wild card games might have been held at Citi Field or at the very least, the Mets would have finished with a winning record. But the fact is they didn’t. Granderson was a bust for most of the season and David’s shoulder was definitely more of a problem than he ever let on. The Mets can’t simply go into next season assuming that both these players will regain their form. Or that Lucas Duda will put up the numbers he did this season as well. It would be wonderful if those things happen but the Mets simply have to bring in a left fielder and/or a shortstop that has some pop.

Speaking of Duda, he was certainly another positive this season. I was completely convinced that the Mets blew it when they traded Ike Davis to the Pirates and kept Duda. I can admit when I am wrong. Duda gained confidence and began to hit homeruns, thirty of them in all with 92 RBI. He still needs to figure out left handers more consistently. If he can figure out how to use the entire field the Mets may really have something in the quiet first baseman. By contrast, Davis contributed to the Bucs drive to the wild card but not nearly with as much production as Duda. Alderson got this one right so give him credit when the popular thinking was to keep Davis.

It should be an interesting off season. Alderson and his staff have their work cut out for them. The Mets improved by five games in 2014 but it should have been more. As Alderson said himself after the last game of the season, the Mets need to improve 11 or 12 games to get to that elite 90 win mark. Hopefully another year under the belt of the Mets young players, a good trade and free agent signing will get them to where they want to be next fall. It’s easy to be negative after another losing season, the sixth in a row. But at least this time there are a great many things to be positive about heading into next season.

Losers

Jacob deGrom strikes out the first eight batters he faced setting a Mets record and tying a major league record. What a great game to add to the Mets Classics library. There is just one problem. The Mets lost the game. Kind of reminds me of a game several years ago when Jose Reyes hit for the cycle. Can’t wait to see that one again. Oh, that’s right—the Mets lost that one too (and they lost Reyes). Oh, and who can ever forget the unbelievable catch made by Endy Chevez in game seven of the 2006 NLCS playoffs. Hmm, a pattern is developing here.

With all due respect to that 2006 team that came so close to making it to the World Series, it is painfully obvious to me that the Mets are what they are, a losing franchise. Since the 2009 season when they moved into the house Jeff built without the team in mind, the Mets have had losing seasons. And that inaugural season at Citi Field was preceded by two collapses in 2007 and 2008, the former a monumental debacle (the numbers 7 and 17 will never be the same).

If you haven’t already figured it out, I am attempting to make a point here. This Mets organization has losing at its core and a lot of it is not just on the field. The team just seems to project a losing atmosphere. How is it that the players, coaches, and manger did not rise to the occasion last night and protect something great that was happening right in front of them? They managed to take back the lead briefly, with a loud “no, not this time”. “This game is ours.” But then the bullpen that has been so reliable this year gave up the lead and a great Mets day turned into another footnote. Where is the passion to win? Where are those in the organization crying out “I’m not going to take it anymore”?

From a talent perspective, I don’t believe the Mets should be in the playoffs this season. However, they should be a .500 team, at least I think. But regardless of what I think, I really believe the club needs an attitude adjustment. But honestly I am not sure how that is going to happen when the owner of the club (and I am referring to the son, not the father) seems to meddle in everything and project the Mets as a second class citizen in New York, baseball wise. You only have to look at the history of Citi Field to understand that.

The Mets new ballpark (now five years old) opened with hardly any adornments of the team and their history. The dimensions of the field stripped their star player of his God given ability to hit the ball the opposite way over the right field fence. Quite simply, there is and always has been a disconnect between this ownership group and the team’s fan base. And how will that change unless the owner is changed and folks, that’s not going to happen, at least not yet.

One of the more recent things to give Mets fans pause is there apparent stance on next year’s payroll. Look, I’m not saying the Mets need to spend Yankee money to field a contender. However, this idea that a team in the New York market must stick to an 88-90 million payroll is absurd and sends a cloudy message to the fan base. We have heard from Jeff Wilpon in the past that if there is a player Sandy Alderson wants, the money will be there. But actions speak louder than words. Nelson Cruz was available last year. The Orioles got him and now they are a win away from clinching the American League East.

I know what Alderson said about Cruz. At the time the Mets were looking, Cruz and his people wanted 60 million over four years. The O’s got him for much less because they waited out the market while the Amazin’s brought in Curtis Granderson. The point is the Mets stock is down and they are going to have to overpay to get quality players to come here. Unfortunately regardless of how true or false, the Mets are perceived by fans and players as cheap and unwilling to do what it takes to win. And that’s a tough sell in a market where the New York Yankees play.

In fairness, I applaud the work Sandy Alderson has done since he took over. The organization was in complete disarray. The head of minor league development was an out of control lunatic who obfuscated any kind of organizational philosophy if there was one. Alderson came in and realized he had to rebuild from the ground up to create a St. Louis/Atlanta/ San Francisco type of organization. With his assistants JP Ricciardi, Paul DePodesta, and John Ricco, the Mets now have one of the top farm systems in all of baseball. Other teams are drooling over the Mets young arms and even some of their position players at the lower levels.

But ultimately the problem with this team lies at the top, an ownership group that does not seize the opportunity to take the next step. The message should not be that our payroll will be around what it was this season. The message should be—we will do whatever it takes to win. And frankly if ownership cannot make that statement then they lose me as a fan. In fact, this will be the first season in many, many years that I have not gone to a Mets game. They apparently need to watch their money very carefully. Well so do I and I can assure you that I have nowhere the funds these people have.

In retrospect, it’s easy to criticize Omar Minaya from many of the bad deals he made that financially strapped this club all while being fleeced by Bernie Madoff. But one thing I remember about Minaya was how when he took over, he told the Wilpons he was going to turn the Mets into a winner. He projected that from the outset when he told the owners he was going to sign Carlos Beltran and Pedro Martinez. Omar became a media sensation with his claims in the media that the Mets would be a force to reckon with and within two seasons, the Mets were in the playoffs. Unfortunately his inability to focus on the entire organization was his downfall but his attitude was correct. He wanted everyone to know the Mets were going to contend. We could use a little of that now on top of what Alderson has done with the organization. And if the Wilpons can’t stomach the cost or simply really have never recovered from Madoff then they should do the right thing and sell the team. It’s doubtful that will happen but look at the stands of Citi Field. They are empty.  And they will remain empty until things change. And if they don’t change, the Wilpons will have no choice but to sell or provide the support Alderson and his staff need.

I want the Mets to succeed but I am tired of being a sucker. All this club needs is a couple of good bats to fortify the lineup. And with these exciting kids they have coming up, the Mets could be an exciting team for many years to come. But the owners have to step up and invest in the product. If you build it we will come and I’m not taking about the stadium, I’m talking about the team. Build the team and we will come.